<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: February, 1962</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/</link>
	<description>culture blogging for the good of the planet</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: newcritics - &#187; Mad Men: Everybody Into The Typing Pool (Liveblog The New Girl)</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-124953</link>
		<dc:creator>newcritics - &#187; Mad Men: Everybody Into The Typing Pool (Liveblog The New Girl)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-124953</guid>
		<description>[...] fun as it is to get lost in, and quibble with, the exhaustive amount of period detail in Mad Men, that&#8217;s not quite where [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fun as it is to get lost in, and quibble with, the exhaustive amount of period detail in Mad Men, that&#8217;s not quite where [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basket of Kisses &#124; Lipp Gloss week of July 28, 2008</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-118792</link>
		<dc:creator>Basket of Kisses &#124; Lipp Gloss week of July 28, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-118792</guid>
		<description>[...] Watson at newcritics offers up a very full look at the cultural relevance, and overall quality, of the show, as it enters its second season. He and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Watson at newcritics offers up a very full look at the cultural relevance, and overall quality, of the show, as it enters its second season. He and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaPeel</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126296</link>
		<dc:creator>MaPeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126296</guid>
		<description>Thanks Thirteen, I do find this interesting. I completely forget about the "Pepsi Generation," which was still around in the seventies, when I heard it. Of course I didn&#39;t realize the import of that slogan.  Poor Don Draper--he is so not part of the drink of  a "new generation."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Thirteen, I do find this interesting. I completely forget about the &#8220;Pepsi Generation,&#8221; which was still around in the seventies, when I heard it. Of course I didn&#39;t realize the import of that slogan.  Poor Don Draper&#8211;he is so not part of the drink of  a &#8220;new generation.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: February, 1962 &#124; Something about Everything</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-118161</link>
		<dc:creator>February, 1962 &#124; Something about Everything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-118161</guid>
		<description>[...] Click to read more&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click to read more&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thirteen1031</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126295</link>
		<dc:creator>Thirteen1031</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126295</guid>
		<description>Pepsi wasn&#39;t new, as you&#39;ve learned, but  (and perhaps you already know all this, but hey, indulge me!) this is one of those layers and nuisances that makes the show so glorious. First, remember that for someone like Dan Draper, a depression era kid, sodas were special. They may have only cost a penny, but a kid rarely had that penny and when they did, it was precious. If they had the money, parents bought much needed milk, not indulgent soda for their kids to drink. By the 50&#39;s however, that age of prosperity, the kids were taking sodas for granted; they had the money to buy one anytime they wanted one. These "kids" that they&#39;re taking about in the episode are the sort who were raised on soda, not milk, and pour it on their cereal. It implies that they take for granted what Draper sees as a special. Further, soda at that time was seen as a kid&#39;s drink and coffee an adult drink. When a kid was given coffee rather than milk or soda, he/she was an adult.. To pour soda on their cereal emphasizes that these "kids" refuse to grow up. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also (and, once again, here&#39;s the wonder of this show, that this one line has so many layers), Pepsi had started a new campaign in the 60&#39;s making itself hip and, yes, youthful. In fact, it beat out Coke because of it. It was the drink of a "new generation." That was the ad slogan. And the ad campaign involved things like pop art to make it more hip. In fact, your googling didn&#39;t go far enough, because the title of this episode comes from, yes, Pespi. To quote:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"1961: Pepsi further refines its target audience, recognizing the increasing importance of the younger, post-war generation. "Now it&#39;s Pepsi, for those who think young" defines youth as a state of mind as much as a chronological age, maintaining the brand&#39;s appeal to all market segments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1962 &lt;br&gt;Pepsi receives its new logo, the sixth in Pepsi history. The "serrated" bottle cap logo debuts, accompanying the brand&#39;s groundbreaking "Pepsi Generation" ad campaign."  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By 1963, Pepsi would be telling the baby-boomers that they were the "Pepsi Generation," connecting themselves with all things young, new, vibrant and hip. All of which is probably a lot more than you wanted to know--and maybe did know, but I do adore the incredible richness of this show. One line says it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pepsi wasn&#39;t new, as you&#39;ve learned, but  (and perhaps you already know all this, but hey, indulge me!) this is one of those layers and nuisances that makes the show so glorious. First, remember that for someone like Dan Draper, a depression era kid, sodas were special. They may have only cost a penny, but a kid rarely had that penny and when they did, it was precious. If they had the money, parents bought much needed milk, not indulgent soda for their kids to drink. By the 50&#39;s however, that age of prosperity, the kids were taking sodas for granted; they had the money to buy one anytime they wanted one. These &#8220;kids&#8221; that they&#39;re taking about in the episode are the sort who were raised on soda, not milk, and pour it on their cereal. It implies that they take for granted what Draper sees as a special. Further, soda at that time was seen as a kid&#39;s drink and coffee an adult drink. When a kid was given coffee rather than milk or soda, he/she was an adult.. To pour soda on their cereal emphasizes that these &#8220;kids&#8221; refuse to grow up. </p>
<p>Also (and, once again, here&#39;s the wonder of this show, that this one line has so many layers), Pepsi had started a new campaign in the 60&#39;s making itself hip and, yes, youthful. In fact, it beat out Coke because of it. It was the drink of a &#8220;new generation.&#8221; That was the ad slogan. And the ad campaign involved things like pop art to make it more hip. In fact, your googling didn&#39;t go far enough, because the title of this episode comes from, yes, Pespi. To quote:</p>
<p>&#8220;1961: Pepsi further refines its target audience, recognizing the increasing importance of the younger, post-war generation. &#8220;Now it&#39;s Pepsi, for those who think young&#8221; defines youth as a state of mind as much as a chronological age, maintaining the brand&#39;s appeal to all market segments.</p>
<p>1962 <br />Pepsi receives its new logo, the sixth in Pepsi history. The &#8220;serrated&#8221; bottle cap logo debuts, accompanying the brand&#39;s groundbreaking &#8220;Pepsi Generation&#8221; ad campaign.&#8221;  </p>
<p>By 1963, Pepsi would be telling the baby-boomers that they were the &#8220;Pepsi Generation,&#8221; connecting themselves with all things young, new, vibrant and hip. All of which is probably a lot more than you wanted to know&#8211;and maybe did know, but I do adore the incredible richness of this show. One line says it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomwatson</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126335</link>
		<dc:creator>tomwatson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126335</guid>
		<description>Hahaha - yes, I await that cultural tsunami with great interest indeed. I may have to put my narrow ties away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha - yes, I await that cultural tsunami with great interest indeed. I may have to put my narrow ties away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James S.</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126334</link>
		<dc:creator>James S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126334</guid>
		<description>Did anyone read the Sunday Times biz section today? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think I found the year 2035 remake of "Mad Men"...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"In depositions and court filings in the second suit — ultimately settled under undisclosed terms — Ms. Epstein and other Endeavor employees described office escapades that included rampant pot-smoking, obscene hazing at corporate retreats, sexual frolics on desks, and one agent demanding that his assistants book prostitutes for him."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those poor souls had no idea of the impending cultural tsunami that would totally change their world...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone read the Sunday Times biz section today? </p>
<p>I think I found the year 2035 remake of &#8220;Mad Men&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;In depositions and court filings in the second suit — ultimately settled under undisclosed terms — Ms. Epstein and other Endeavor employees described office escapades that included rampant pot-smoking, obscene hazing at corporate retreats, sexual frolics on desks, and one agent demanding that his assistants book prostitutes for him.&#8221;</p>
<p>Those poor souls had no idea of the impending cultural tsunami that would totally change their world&#8230;</p>
<p>Right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomwatson</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126333</link>
		<dc:creator>tomwatson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126333</guid>
		<description>Well, I always enjoy the encore presentation - until the clever opening credits are over. Then it&#39;s good night!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I always enjoy the encore presentation - until the clever opening credits are over. Then it&#39;s good night!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaPeel</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126332</link>
		<dc:creator>MaPeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126332</guid>
		<description>Oh, we forgot to speculate who Don is sending O&#39;Hara to--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, we forgot to speculate who Don is sending O&#39;Hara to&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaPeel</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126331</link>
		<dc:creator>MaPeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126331</guid>
		<description>It seems like a crutch for Weiner. If he hasn&#39;t gotten his point across, he knows he can just tell us about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like a crutch for Weiner. If he hasn&#39;t gotten his point across, he knows he can just tell us about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomwatson</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126326</link>
		<dc:creator>tomwatson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126326</guid>
		<description>That was so clearly a soundstage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was so clearly a soundstage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomwatson</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126330</link>
		<dc:creator>tomwatson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126330</guid>
		<description>He&#39;s still haunted and searching at 36.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most promising new character?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The mechanic, hands down. What&#39;s his home life like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#39;s still haunted and searching at 36.</p>
<p>Most promising new character?</p>
<p>The mechanic, hands down. What&#39;s his home life like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaPeel</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126325</link>
		<dc:creator>MaPeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126325</guid>
		<description>The color of the hedges in that scene and the red of the mailbox were entering Pushing Daisies territory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The color of the hedges in that scene and the red of the mailbox were entering Pushing Daisies territory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clairehelene7</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126329</link>
		<dc:creator>clairehelene7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126329</guid>
		<description>My favorite was, "It&#39;s been 14 months and Don is older and feeling it."  It&#39;s been a year and now he&#39;s 36 instead of 35.  He&#39;s aging quickly.  Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite was, &#8220;It&#39;s been 14 months and Don is older and feeling it.&#8221;  It&#39;s been a year and now he&#39;s 36 instead of 35.  He&#39;s aging quickly.  Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomwatson</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126328</link>
		<dc:creator>tomwatson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126328</guid>
		<description>Yeah, especially "things have changed."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ridiculous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, especially &#8220;things have changed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ridiculous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clairehelene7</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126327</link>
		<dc:creator>clairehelene7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126327</guid>
		<description>God, I think these explanations at the end to be so obnoxious.  How many times do we need to be hit on the head with what happened?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, I think these explanations at the end to be so obnoxious.  How many times do we need to be hit on the head with what happened?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameswolcott</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126324</link>
		<dc:creator>jameswolcott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126324</guid>
		<description>That overhead shot at the mailbox must mean something--but what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That overhead shot at the mailbox must mean something&#8211;but what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clairehelene7</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126323</link>
		<dc:creator>clairehelene7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126323</guid>
		<description>Betty annoys me to no end.  Partially because I think the actress is just not very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Betty annoys me to no end.  Partially because I think the actress is just not very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaPeel</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126322</link>
		<dc:creator>MaPeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126322</guid>
		<description>Belle du Draper in her dreams?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belle du Draper in her dreams?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomwatson</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126321</link>
		<dc:creator>tomwatson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126321</guid>
		<description>The Esso - nice reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Esso - nice reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameswolcott</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126320</link>
		<dc:creator>jameswolcott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126320</guid>
		<description>Gallantry isn&#39;t dead, at least in the elevator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gallantry isn&#39;t dead, at least in the elevator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaPeel</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126319</link>
		<dc:creator>MaPeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126319</guid>
		<description>Okay,  who did say "sex sells"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay,  who did say &#8220;sex sells&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaPeel</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126318</link>
		<dc:creator>MaPeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126318</guid>
		<description>Stepford Cooper is very strange. Well, the original Invasion of the Body Snatchers in 1956---maybe it&#39;s really Pod Peggy, Pod Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stepford Cooper is very strange. Well, the original Invasion of the Body Snatchers in 1956&#8212;maybe it&#39;s really Pod Peggy, Pod Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clairehelene7</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126317</link>
		<dc:creator>clairehelene7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126317</guid>
		<description>Didn&#39;t Don push for Duck to come to the firm in the first place?  I guess that&#39;s the change in 18 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#39;t Don push for Duck to come to the firm in the first place?  I guess that&#39;s the change in 18 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomwatson</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126316</link>
		<dc:creator>tomwatson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126316</guid>
		<description>She so wishes she had a single golden ounce of Shirley MacLaine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She so wishes she had a single golden ounce of Shirley MacLaine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomwatson</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126314</link>
		<dc:creator>tomwatson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126314</guid>
		<description>Hee hee. Good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hee hee. Good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameswolcott</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126315</link>
		<dc:creator>jameswolcott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126315</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#39;t Peggy be less robotic by now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#39;t Peggy be less robotic by now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaPeel</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126313</link>
		<dc:creator>MaPeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126313</guid>
		<description>Oh my gosh, one of the Clancy brothers is applying for copywriter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my gosh, one of the Clancy brothers is applying for copywriter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomwatson</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126312</link>
		<dc:creator>tomwatson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126312</guid>
		<description>18 months later - what&#39;s changed? Can anyone tell me what&#39;s changed? Don&#39;s still "on the edge." His wife is still in the throes of "existential stupid." The firm&#39;s still lousy. Sexism reigns. What is new here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18 months later - what&#39;s changed? Can anyone tell me what&#39;s changed? Don&#39;s still &#8220;on the edge.&#8221; His wife is still in the throes of &#8220;existential stupid.&#8221; The firm&#39;s still lousy. Sexism reigns. What is new here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameswolcott</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126311</link>
		<dc:creator>jameswolcott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126311</guid>
		<description>Everybody&#39;s line readings are strangely timbreless. Packed in cotton padding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody&#39;s line readings are strangely timbreless. Packed in cotton padding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaPeel</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126310</link>
		<dc:creator>MaPeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126310</guid>
		<description>I happen to know that not too long ago, Jackie&#39;s tour of the White House was one of the top programs requested at The Museum of Television &#038; Radio--&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice connecting conceit here, just like the Seinfeld episode when Will and Jack kiss on the Today Show</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happen to know that not too long ago, Jackie&#39;s tour of the White House was one of the top programs requested at The Museum of Television &#038; Radio&#8211;</p>
<p>Nice connecting conceit here, just like the Seinfeld episode when Will and Jack kiss on the Today Show</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomwatson</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126309</link>
		<dc:creator>tomwatson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126309</guid>
		<description>Let&#39;s see if Jackie Kennedy works on ole Don....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#39;s see if Jackie Kennedy works on ole Don&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomwatson</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126307</link>
		<dc:creator>tomwatson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126307</guid>
		<description>It&#39;s the ennui, man - the ennui!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s the ennui, man - the ennui!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaPeel</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126308</link>
		<dc:creator>MaPeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126308</guid>
		<description>Yike, Don is really coming apart at the seams---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yike, Don is really coming apart at the seams&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clairehelene7</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/07/28/february-1962/#comment-126306</link>
		<dc:creator>clairehelene7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/?p=866#comment-126306</guid>
		<description>Yes, he even doesn&#39;t have to cover for his poverty-stricken past anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, he even doesn&#39;t have to cover for his poverty-stricken past anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
