<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grand Old Man of the New Journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/</link>
	<description>culture blogging for the good of the planet</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: RalphDeMarco</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-126347</link>
		<dc:creator>RalphDeMarco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-126347</guid>
		<description>I have only read the &#39;kool-aid acid test&#39; and a few essays. I was really knocked out by &#39;acid-test&#39;. He reveals many unspoken truths about our culture with elegant prose and wit -- but to me there&#39;s a patronizing tone. Perhaps I need to take another look since he&#39;s so adored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have only read the &#39;kool-aid acid test&#39; and a few essays. I was really knocked out by &#39;acid-test&#39;. He reveals many unspoken truths about our culture with elegant prose and wit &#8212; but to me there&#39;s a patronizing tone. Perhaps I need to take another look since he&#39;s so adored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Campaspe</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-126346</link>
		<dc:creator>Campaspe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-126346</guid>
		<description>Wolfe is a fine writer, but I always thought Leonard Bernstein (full disclosure: my favorite conductor) got a raw deal from him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolfe is a fine writer, but I always thought Leonard Bernstein (full disclosure: my favorite conductor) got a raw deal from him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Wolf</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-126345</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-126345</guid>
		<description>The Right Stuff, whatever its faults as accurate journalism, is a helluva good read, perhaps because the view Wolfe took of the space program was such a contrast to the Life Magazine publicity machine&#39;s output.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I agree with Tom (Watson, not Wolfe) on the tendency toward a one-dimensional view of whatever subject is at hand. Reading Wolfe on modern art and architecture (particularly The Painted Word but also From Bauhaus to Our House) can be annoying as hell if you know anything at all about art. He certainly did not convince me, despite its excesses and methods, that the entire project of Modern Art -- which occupied so many people and had such an impact in the 20th Century -- was complete bullshit, though he certainly tried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Right Stuff, whatever its faults as accurate journalism, is a helluva good read, perhaps because the view Wolfe took of the space program was such a contrast to the Life Magazine publicity machine&#39;s output.</p>
<p>But I agree with Tom (Watson, not Wolfe) on the tendency toward a one-dimensional view of whatever subject is at hand. Reading Wolfe on modern art and architecture (particularly The Painted Word but also From Bauhaus to Our House) can be annoying as hell if you know anything at all about art. He certainly did not convince me, despite its excesses and methods, that the entire project of Modern Art &#8212; which occupied so many people and had such an impact in the 20th Century &#8212; was complete bullshit, though he certainly tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomwatson</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-126344</link>
		<dc:creator>tomwatson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-126344</guid>
		<description>My view on Bonfire came from working as a political reporter in the Bronx at the time - and yes, it was incredibly ham-handed, no nuance at all. Even the Al Sharpton character was the merest of caricatures....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My view on Bonfire came from working as a political reporter in the Bronx at the time - and yes, it was incredibly ham-handed, no nuance at all. Even the Al Sharpton character was the merest of caricatures&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LanceMannion</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-126343</link>
		<dc:creator>LanceMannion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-126343</guid>
		<description>Man oh man, how I used to love Wolfe&#39;s write stuff.  But Bonfire of the Vanities soured me a bit, and not because of its politics, but because it was so hamhanded in its characterizations.  And then I learned that my favorite of his non-fiction books, The Right Stuff, included a fair amount of fiction.  Now I&#39;m no longer sure what I think, unless I&#39;m actually reading something by him.  Then I tend to think, Wow can this man tell a really fine lie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man oh man, how I used to love Wolfe&#39;s write stuff.  But Bonfire of the Vanities soured me a bit, and not because of its politics, but because it was so hamhanded in its characterizations.  And then I learned that my favorite of his non-fiction books, The Right Stuff, included a fair amount of fiction.  Now I&#39;m no longer sure what I think, unless I&#39;m actually reading something by him.  Then I tend to think, Wow can this man tell a really fine lie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomwatson</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-126342</link>
		<dc:creator>tomwatson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-126342</guid>
		<description>Bob - he is indeed a fascinating figure. It&#39;s funny, because he was praised so lavishly for Bonfire of the Vanities - yet he got it so damned wrong! Or rather, he got a one-dimensional cartoonish view from a single source (a law-and-order Bronx judge who was his pal) - yet it&#39;s considered a a true journal of 80s New York!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob - he is indeed a fascinating figure. It&#39;s funny, because he was praised so lavishly for Bonfire of the Vanities - yet he got it so damned wrong! Or rather, he got a one-dimensional cartoonish view from a single source (a law-and-order Bronx judge who was his pal) - yet it&#39;s considered a a true journal of 80s New York!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
