<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Geek Report: NBC has Seen the Future&#8230;and It&#8217;s in Their Lineup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/10/24/nbc-has-seen-the-futureand-its-in-their-lineup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/10/24/nbc-has-seen-the-futureand-its-in-their-lineup/</link>
	<description>culture blogging for the good of the planet</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Howard Greenstein&#8217;s Website &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I&#8217;ve been writing elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/10/24/nbc-has-seen-the-futureand-its-in-their-lineup/#comment-35794</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Greenstein&#8217;s Website &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I&#8217;ve been writing elsewhere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/10/24/nbc-has-seen-the-futureand-its-in-their-lineup/#comment-35794</guid>
		<description>[...] See my review of NBC&#8217;s SciFI shows for the season (Must Geek TV?) at New Critics. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See my review of NBC&#8217;s SciFI shows for the season (Must Geek TV?) at New Critics. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Tryon</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/10/24/nbc-has-seen-the-futureand-its-in-their-lineup/#comment-35774</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Tryon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/10/24/nbc-has-seen-the-futureand-its-in-their-lineup/#comment-35774</guid>
		<description>I've stuck with "Chuck" even though it seems a bit thin, if only because "Heroes" remains essential viewing for me.  I tried "Journeyman" because I'm a sucker for time travel narratives (I even wrote my dissertation on time travel movies), but never really got beyond the first episode.

But what I really wanted to mention (and complain about) is the sheer number of movie and TV shows either featuring characters named "Chuck" or "Chuck" in their titles.  I'd be fine with it, but two of those movies feature Dane Cook and Adam Sandler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve stuck with &#8220;Chuck&#8221; even though it seems a bit thin, if only because &#8220;Heroes&#8221; remains essential viewing for me.  I tried &#8220;Journeyman&#8221; because I&#8217;m a sucker for time travel narratives (I even wrote my dissertation on time travel movies), but never really got beyond the first episode.</p>
<p>But what I really wanted to mention (and complain about) is the sheer number of movie and TV shows either featuring characters named &#8220;Chuck&#8221; or &#8220;Chuck&#8221; in their titles.  I&#8217;d be fine with it, but two of those movies feature Dane Cook and Adam Sandler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Watson</title>
		<link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/10/24/nbc-has-seen-the-futureand-its-in-their-lineup/#comment-35682</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/10/24/nbc-has-seen-the-futureand-its-in-their-lineup/#comment-35682</guid>
		<description>Hey Howard,nice post! Welcome to newcritics - we need more geeky goodness in this neighborhood. 

I kinda like Chuck - it's incredibly light, though. Like a handful of candy corn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Howard,nice post! Welcome to newcritics - we need more geeky goodness in this neighborhood. </p>
<p>I kinda like Chuck - it&#8217;s incredibly light, though. Like a handful of candy corn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
