Number 55,384 With A Bullet


The KissI had my Oscar acceptance speech all ready. It was gonna be a beaut…funny, touching …something that would appeal to both the heads and hearts of my adoring public. Then I read the review in the Boston Globe, which called The Kiss the worst film of the 2003 Boston Film Festival. The critic in Beantown’s Phoenix was more to the point (and I quote): “an insipid crock of shit.” I wondered how we were going to excerpt THAT one on the movie poster should the film ever be picked up for general release…”INSIPID” – The Boston Phoenix…that wasn’t going to fly. “Crock” and “Shit” posed similar challenges.

I figured we’d end up with: “OF” – The Boston Phoenix.

Yes, I am the co-screenwriter of 2003’s The Kiss – you can look it up for yourself on IMDB or Amazon, where, as of this writing, it is the 55,384th best selling DVD they’re offering. You might even be able to find a copy in your local Blockbuster’s. My kids excitedly noticed a copy tucked into a corner of our local store here in Pleasantville (yes, I really live in a town called Pleasantville), and I had to quickly shush them lest I be outed. In Pleasantville, one must keep up appearances, you know?

That discovery led to several sleepless nights: what set of decisions had led the store to purchase that sole copy for rental? Had anyone, in fact, ever rented it? And what had they thought of it? My one experience with an audience – at the film’s premiere at the Boston Film Festival – was mystifying: a quarter-filled theater, in which my unpredictable friend Michael stood up before the film’s start and introduced a mortified me (I had already seen a copy of the move, and knew what was coming) to the befuddled onlookers. There were some overall kind words from these folks when the lights came on…one scary woman whispered to me that the movie it had changed her life…and then I was surrounded by a gang of kids in their late teens who asked for my autograph (my friends will verify that), telling me they had traveled five hours to see the film. “Why?” I asked incredulously. “Eliza!” they exclaimed in unison, showing me scrapbooks leaking Buffy The Vampire clippings.

It had all started so promisingly.I wrote the screenplay in the early 90’s with high school friend (now novelist and filmmaker) Gorman Bechard. It kicked around Hollywood for years, my theory being that it was just not quite bad enough to reject out of hand. After numerous false starts, it was finally picked up by an independent producer who committed to making it as a star vehicle for his actress wife. Titanic’s Billy Zane, Buffy’s Eliza Dushku, the Limey’s Terence Stamp, and indie-staple Illeana Douglas were soon attached. Against all odds, the thing looked like it was going to get made.

KissAnd it did: two days of location shooting in Paris…four more weeks at a soundstage in Culver City, where I caught up with the production…real sets…real crew…real craft services. But when I saw the dailies, the sad truth set in: it was real bad.

Against all hope, I prayed that, when edited and scored, the final product would be great. I’d read about how Annie Hall was a mess until they got it into the editing room…and if it had worked for Woody, why not me?

Alas it was not to be.

So what are the takeaways?

(1) Being a nobody can have its benefits: Gorman and I were paid up-front for the screenplay because we did not have the power to command gross points.

(2) Writers cannot protect their scripts from actors, directors, and producers who are all intent on making the movie their own.

(3) The catering at the soundstage was good, but not as lavish as on the set of the X-Files (according to the stand-in for the lead actress who had performed the similar function for Gillian Anderson).

(4) I wish I were a better screenwriter.

(5) It – the whole process, from the writing of the script to the writing of this post – has been some of the greatest fun I’ve had in my entire life.

Editor’s note: Steve’s film - and those of us who know him always call it “Steve’s film” - has also received more positive reviews, mostly from real people. One film-viewer on Amazon calls it “an absolutely lovely meditation on love, and what love actually means.” Another clearly had the writers in mind: “The storyline was great. Looking for the last chapter of a love story that was written years earlier had fantastic potential. I always enjoys a good romantic movie and this designed to be one.” So there. Who needs real critics at newcritics, anyway!

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
The Unfinished Epic of Peter O’Toole
Winners and Sociopaths: the Mind of Stephen Cloud

Readers

Adverts

Liberal Prose

Featured book:


discussion by DISQUS

Add New Comment

Viewing 4 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Well, I really want to see Steve's Film. I've never liked those old, stuffy, snotty, hoity toity critics and the way they can bash someone's hot fudge sundae.

    About the things you learned, Steve...

    Writers cannot protect their scripts from actors, directors, and producers who are all intent on making the movie their own.

    When I learned that that was true (not that I have firsthand experience, just learned it from some interview or something some time with someone when I was in my late teens) I thought that was the *most* unfair thing to a writer ever. Still do.

    The all grown up, jaded blue girl should say, Well, that's life. Not fair, ya know. That's the way it goes.

    But, the idealistic blue girl says, What a total crock, *raspberries.*
    • ^
    • v
    I think (and I'm just guessing here), that making art of any sort and showing it to the public is hard enough. I can't imagine the agony of creating something only to have someone else mangle it. Because you're name is still on it, even if it no longer your vision. You've got to be a lot braver than me.
    • ^
    • v
    Pleasantville, home of Reader's Digest and neighboring town of the Clintons, is a fine place to be.

    Writers also cannot protect their writing from editors, proofreaders, copyeditors, typesetters, designers, and cover artists (all of whom, it should be noted, also are professionals doing their job). It's why the co-screenwriter of Winter Carnival spoke of "creat[ing] out of the materials of the human spirit something which did not exist before."

    Not all inventions are used as they were originally intended. The creation is none the less.
    • ^
    • v
    Sorry for the brain short-circuit; was thinking of the co-screenwriter of To Have and Have Not, of course.
blog comments powered by Disqus